At least seven people dead in a Jewish seminary in Jerusalem after yet another terrorist attack there.

And Arabs, being Arabs, solemnly mourned the dead innocent civilians. No wait, they took out their guns (of course they all have guns) and danced in the streets.

In Gaza City, residents went out into the streets and fired rifles in celebration in the air after hearing news of the attack on the seminary.

Who can possibly say that these are real human beings? These are cold blooded murderers and the only rational solution is to wipe them all out and forget that they ever existed. Otherwise they’ll just keep on flying planes into buildings and finding other ways of killing innocent people that don’t believe in their horrible, evil god.

What kind of a weird war this is. People who are arrested for being terrorists and enemy combatants and plotting against America and freedom are able to get people to put up entire web sites trying to convince people that this person sitting in Guantanamo Bay isn’t really a terrorist at all, just some harmless person with a legitimate sounding cover story:

Adel Hamad was a teacher of elementary school orphans, a hospital worker, and someone who coordinated the delivery of food, medicine and blankets to refugees. He has been imprisoned for 5 years and classified as an enemy combatant, despite the lack of any allegations or evidence that he ever acted against the U.S. or its allies, or even had political sympathies for those who did. His friends and colleagues describe him as a funny, apolitical man who loved charity work and ping-pong. One of the U.S. Army Majors at his Tribunal called his detention unconscionable.

And you have quotes like this on their site:

Interviews with his employers, his colleagues, his brother-in-law, and his landlord all describe Adel Hamad as a family man with a good sense of humor, a man who never spoke of politics, who was not a radical or an extremist.

Well of course someone who was part of Al Qaeda wouldn’t want anyone else to know about it. And anyone who did know about it would be part of them also and wouldn’t go telling Americans that he was really a terrorist even after he got arrested. Why would they?

But there he is, sitting in jail at Guantanamo Bay, so obviously he’s guilty of something. What will they do with their web site when they find the evidence they need to put him away? They better shut it off fast before they get sent to Guantanamo also for supporting a terrorist like that.

Why are people still talking about the Iraq Study Group report? That bloated, irrational liberal piece of junk came out more than a week ago, but people are still paying attention to it and talking about it? Things like that report dont just go away by talking about them, they go away by ignoring them. I think its about time for us all to do that.

The Political Grind has a good comment on why the report isnt realistic:

We cannot begin to turn the tide and win the war on terror until we acknowledge that peace is antithetical to Islamism, and that we cannot haggle with those who live and thrive on the prospect of reaching “heaven” through our demise.

Really, its like the whole report was written by the terrorists themselves. Oh, no, that’s just the liberals. Get them mixed up all the time sorry about that.

Who else would encourage a cut and run strategy in Iraq? The report keeps saying that we need to change what we’re doing and leave Iraq and give up on freedom and democracy there. Thats not what Bush and America is all about so why are they trying to get people to go along with it? Oh yeah because they’re the liberal terrorists that are trying to convert us all to be Muslims and get their war on Christmas going again.

And the liberal media falls for it as usual. Or maybe theyre not falling for anything, they are willingly going along with the liberal talking points about how cutting and running really is a good idea and good for freedom and all that. Of course the media will say that, that’s what the liberals want you to hear. They’re not going to tell you the truth about Muslims being terrorists and wanting to kill us all unless we finish spreading democracy throughout their land.

So just stop talking about the Iraq Study group report and it’ll go away. We can only hope.

Wow, this is really something worth mentioning and repeating as often as necessary. Maureen Dowd, the typical New York Times liberal writer, has a new column out called The Unslammed Phone where she talks about the new documentary about the Clinton administration’s involvement in 9/11.

But even Dowd can’t fight back against the truth of the matter in this case. Normally liberals will hold on to their lies with all their might, refusing to admit any bits of truth that might upset their precious little fantasy world that they live in. So to see Maureen Dowd give in and admit that Bill Clinton was responsible for September 11th, well, it just warms the heart. It shows that we are finally making some progress against the rediculous liberal bias in the media.

Dowd writes

Bill was distracted by the Monica fallout, just as W. was distracted, on Osama and Katrina, by his insistence on living life as usual in Crawford. Bill had no natural inclination to use American force and fumbled on how to strike back at Osama. W., petulantly, did not want to focus on terrorism because his predecessor had.

Wow. She openly says that Clinton was distracted by his Monica Lewinsky mess, and fumbled against Osama. Oh my God. If that isn’t something worth standing up and calling attention to, I don’t know what is. Here we have a liberal actually putting some of the blame of September 11th on Bill Clinton. Obviously everyone realizes the New York Time’s natural extreme liberal bias makes this article far kinder to Clinton than he deserves. That means that Clinton is hugely responsible for 9/11. We have the proof right here, Maureen Dowd admits it!

Here’s how she ended her column

The argument over which president is to blame for 9/11 is tiresome. Both obviously bear some blame. There are no West Wing heroes in this story.

We all know that Bush is not to blame, that’s just the typical mainstream media liberal bias seeping into the article. They can’t help it, it’s automatic over there. But seeing them put some of the blame on Clinton himself, well, it just brings a tear to the eye. This is a proud day in truthfulness in reporting, and I have never been prouder of this country.

I bet this will anger their liberal controllers in the Democratic Party, and I have a feeling the New York Times is going to get even more ultra-liberal as a response. But who knows, maybe this is the beginning of the end for them. We can only hope.

Its only a few days after the Heathrow Airport scares and arrests, and we already have “leading British Muslim politicans” making threats against democracy and freedom according to the Washington Post:

“To combat terror, the government has focused extensively on domestic legislation. While some of this will have an impact, the government must not ignore the role of its foreign policy,” the letter said. “The debacle of Iraq and the failure to do more to secure an immediate end to the attacks on civilians in the Middle East not only increases the risk to ordinary people in that region, it is also ammunition to extremists who threaten us all.”

Wow, look at that. Threats that there will be more attacks if England doesn’t pull out of Iraq, right there in public from leading British (Muslim) politicians. If that’s not a sign that all Muslims are out to get us, I don’t know what is. They can’t stand the way we’re promoting freedom and liberation in Iraq, and they have to resort to threatening more and more terrorist attacks by extremists to try to get us to pull out.

Meanwhile we can see how lucky we are that the Democrats aren’t in charge right now. Democratic Senator Charles Schumer was stuck at Heathrow during all this, and all he can do is complain about delays:

“It’s a nightmare, everyone’s stuck, and our flight is apparently delayed until Sunday,” the senator told The Associated Press by phone.

Obviously if he or any other Democrat was in charge, they’d find a way to make it easier for everyone to deal with. Wouldn’t want to upset anybody by making them go through security lines or anything like that. Of course, we’d all be dead from endless terrorist bombs too. And the Democrats still think Americans are going to go for that.