According to Right Wing News the Democrats (a.k.a Communists and Anarchists) invaded the Washington DC Capitol Building with disgusting anti-war signs and protests and clogged up traffic all over the city. It shows you what kind of respect these people have for other people and the rest of society.

But the worst thing is that the police were ordered to let them deface the Capitol building! We really have lost this country if this is what is going to be going on here:

Anti-war protesters were allowed to spray paint on part of the west front steps of the United States Capitol building after police were ordered to break their security line by their leadership, two sources told The Hill.

According to the sources, police officers were livid when they were told to fall back by U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) Chief Phillip Morse and Deputy Chief Daniel Nichols. “They were the commanders on the scene,” one source said, who requested anonymity. “It was disgusting.”

After police ceded the stairs, located on the lower west front of the Capitol, the building was locked down, the source added.

A second source who witnessed the incident said that the police had the crowd stopped at Third Street, but were told to bring the police line in front of the Capitol.

Approximately 300 protesters were allowed to take the steps and began to spray paint “anarchist symbols” and phrase such as “Our capitol building” and “you can’t stop us” around the area, the source said.

The article also goes on to say that they tried to “breach into secure areas and rush the doors of the Capitol” but luckily the police were not told to surrender in that case and they were able to defend the building from the invaders. You know that the liberals wanted the police to cut and run from their job to let them in, just like they want to cut and run in Iraq and let the terrorists win.

And in case you hadn’t heard, the protesters even let Jane Fonda join them. How arrogantly anti-American do you have to be to let Jane Fonda protest with you? That’s a clear message that these moonbats hate America, hate our soldiers, and hate freedom.

All I can’t understand is why the police backed down instead of arresting these crazies for treason?

Well what a way to start 2007. Saddam Hussein is dead, and now we see that everyone on the Internet is as excited about that as those of us who have been approving of the war in Iraq all along.

If you look at Technorati, the top searches are for people wanting to download and talk about the video of Saddam Hussein’s execution, probably the cell phone video showing the hanging itself, not the Iraq television one that doesn’t really show anything.

Would people really be looking for the execution video if they didn’t, deep down, support our President and the war in Iraq? Of course not. They can say whatever they think other people want to hear about not supporting the war when theyre in public, but at there computers in the privacy of there home, its all about downloading the video of Saddam hanging and watching it over and over again.

Because deep down even the left-wing liberal moonbats who protest the war really know that its the right thing to do.

In fact, you get to find posts like this one on the Internet from people who definitely seem to support his execution:

In case you missed my post, i am uncluding into this blog a link to a bootleg crap quality recording of the execution…i like this one better because unlike the News networks it dont cut off right away after the rope is placed around his head. This one you get the satisfaction of seeing him start to drop through the floor as it is removed from beneath him, then the camera quickly drops down…but you get to hear everything going on! Yeah! its exciting! Call me morbid, but i think this is a great video and i give it Two Thumbs Up!

So the next time you hear the liberal media complaining about the war in Iraq and how it’s a bad idea, just show them how many people are out there searching for the Saddam execution video, and then see what they have to say to that. I bet it’ll shut them right up.

A loyal reader sent me the following editorial, which definitely brings up some interesting ideas and which I haven’t seen any discussion of yet:

The Draft

The draft. That’s right America. I, Stephen Colbert, am calling for the reactivation of Selective Service. I say we call up our nation’s able-bodied young adults to serve their country.

Folks, we need the draft. We need the draft to put more soldiers in the field but more importantly to put more protesters in the street. It recently occurred to me that their might be some similarities between Iraq and Vietnam. For one thing, both wars proved that John Kerry is a coward. But their is a difference. See, Vietnam’s anti-war movement was so unbearably strident that many Americans hated the hippies even more than they hated the war. The result? They became Republicans. And just five years after the fall of Saigon, the Reagan revolution swept into power. Any way you look at this, that was a victory for America.

Now the problem with the Iraq war is that public opposition has been unbelievably tame. The liberal nutjobs say the administration lied about WMDs, lied about links between Al Qaeda and Iraq, mismanaged the occupation, all while enriching their corporate masters in the military industrial complex. So how do the enraged throngs fight back? Run for your lives, they’re blogging! During the Vietnam War there were topless protests. There were graduate students shouting “baby killer” at returning troops and Hollywood princesses like Jane Fonda going go-go dancing with the Viet Cong. Now that is stuff you can reject.

Today’s dissident is so tepid that instead of blaming the dissenters, people might actually blame the administration. That’s why reinstating the draft will give us something far more valuable than increased troop levels. It will give us college students who are scared so shitless they will do something in the name of the anti-war movement that’s unforgivable. We need some spoiled rich kid to throw a mochachino at Jessica Lynch. We need some clueless starlet to hug Muqtada al-Sadr. How about Britney Spears, she seems lost. Give her a burka.

Liberal activism will once again be so offensive to average Americans that whether or not we win in Iraq, conservatives will bounce back in 2008 and keep power for years to come.

Its a good idea, and it all makes sense, but I don’t think it will actually work out. I think that the left-wing moonbats are doing these kinds of over the top protests right now, but because we only have the liberal media to report on it, they choose not to.

Why would the liberal media want to show us what kind of disgusting protests are really going on in America’s liberal universities and cities? As Mr. Colbert says, that would only make the public realize what kind of people the liberals actually are, and drive more people to the Republicans. The liberal media hates that idea, and so they just aren’t showing us any of the bad protests.

Reinstating the draft might make the protests even worse, but I don’t see any reason why the liberal media would start reporting on them in that case. They can just keep ignoring them the way they do right now.

Why are people still talking about the Iraq Study Group report? That bloated, irrational liberal piece of junk came out more than a week ago, but people are still paying attention to it and talking about it? Things like that report dont just go away by talking about them, they go away by ignoring them. I think its about time for us all to do that.

The Political Grind has a good comment on why the report isnt realistic:

We cannot begin to turn the tide and win the war on terror until we acknowledge that peace is antithetical to Islamism, and that we cannot haggle with those who live and thrive on the prospect of reaching “heaven” through our demise.

Really, its like the whole report was written by the terrorists themselves. Oh, no, that’s just the liberals. Get them mixed up all the time sorry about that.

Who else would encourage a cut and run strategy in Iraq? The report keeps saying that we need to change what we’re doing and leave Iraq and give up on freedom and democracy there. Thats not what Bush and America is all about so why are they trying to get people to go along with it? Oh yeah because they’re the liberal terrorists that are trying to convert us all to be Muslims and get their war on Christmas going again.

And the liberal media falls for it as usual. Or maybe theyre not falling for anything, they are willingly going along with the liberal talking points about how cutting and running really is a good idea and good for freedom and all that. Of course the media will say that, that’s what the liberals want you to hear. They’re not going to tell you the truth about Muslims being terrorists and wanting to kill us all unless we finish spreading democracy throughout their land.

So just stop talking about the Iraq Study group report and it’ll go away. We can only hope.

It looks like NBC is moving further and further to the extreme liberal side of things, because on Monday morning Matt Lauer took it upon himself to declare that Iraq was in a civil war:

For months the White House rejected claims that the situation in Iraq has deteriorated into civil war. For the most part news organizations like NBC hesitated to characterize it as such. After careful consideration, NBC News has decided the change in terminology is warranted and what is going on in Iraq can now be characteritized as civil war.

Why not let the people of Iraq decide whether or not they have a civil war, using the tools of democracy that we just gave them? Why should the liberal American media make those decisions for the Iraqi people when they can do it for themselves these days in a good old fashioned election or telephone survey?

And then there was this:

Matt Lauer: The White House objects to the terminology that NBC News is now using, and here is part of the statement that they’ve released: ‘While the situation on the ground is very serious, neither Prime Minister Maliki nor we believe that Iraq is in a civil war.’ It goes on to say that ‘the violence is largely centered around Baghdad, and Baghdad security and the increased training of Iraqi security forces is at the top of the agenda when President Bush and Prime Minister Maliki meet later this week in Jordan. What about that idea, General, that the violence is primarily centered in Baghdad, that the country hasn’t erupted into all-out civil war?

Gen. Barry McCaffrey: I think a lot of that is nonsense. Baghdad is 25 percent of the population of the country. It’s the central battlefield.

Ok, but here you guys are out and out saying that it’s only in 25% of the country, which obviously means that it’s not in the other 75% of Iraq! Wouldn’t a real civil war have to take over the whole country?

Anyway, it’s a pretty laughable thing for NBC to try to claim, and so it’s almost not worth pointing out, except that the rest of the liberal media is just letting it slide of course when they should be confronting NBC about their lies and manipulation of the truth.

Wasn’t it just before Election Day that the Democrats were claiming that they weren’t the cut and run types, and that everything would work out perfectly in Iraq if only we’d follow them and do what they said and vote for them?

Well now that people have voted for them, it looks like they’re changing their minds:

BREITBART.COM - Emboldened Democrats to Urge Iraq Exit

The Bush administration must tell Iraq that U.S. troops will begin withdrawing in four to six months, the next chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee said Wednesday, as Congress began re- examining U.S. policy in the wake of last week’s Democratic election victory.

“We cannot save the Iraqis from themselves. The only way for Iraqi leaders to squarely face that reality is for President Bush to tell them that the United States will begin a phased redeployment of our forces within four to six months,” Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., said at the outset of a hearing featuring the top U.S. commander in the Middle East.

Great.  And this guy is the next chairman of the Armed Services Committee?  Now do you people see what voting for the Democrats has done?  You’ve plunged the whole world into chaos and terrorism.

On the plus side, at least this means that the Republicans can take over again at the next election.  That’s if America survives two years without being nuked out of existance by the Islamic terrorists that are going to be taking advantage of this opportunity.

It looks like Bush is going to declassify the report that the Democrats are using to claim that invading Iraq was a bad idea.

The White House contends that the document’s widely reported conclusion — that the Iraq war has increased the threat from terrorism — represents only “a fraction” of the judgments made in the document. The report, completed in April, reflects the consensus view of 16 government intelligence services.

Bush charged at the news conference that political opponents leaked select parts of the National Intelligence Estimate to media organizations last weekend “to create confusion in the minds of the American people” in the weeks before the Nov. 7 mid-term elections.

While it’s too bad that the Democrats have forced the government to partially undermine it’s security (after all, documents are classified for a reason, you can’t just go around declassifying them just because the left wing media and the Democrats are hoping there’s bad stuff about Bush in there), it’s good that we’ll finally be able to see the truth. We all know that the lies in the media about invading Iraq increasing terrorism aren’t true. Invading Iraq shows the terrorists that we mean business.

Now with the full report released, at least the media will have to apologize for their negative claims. But do you think they will? Of course not, they’ll just ignore it and pretend it never happened.

Bush agrees with my thoughts about declassifying documents for no good reason:

“Somebody has taken it upon themselves to leak classified information for political purposes,” Bush said. “I think it’s a bad habit for our government to declassify every time there is a leak.”

There should be more serious consequences for leaking classified information. What better way is there to strengthen terrorists than to give out classified information that they shouldn’t have? Classified information is classified because revealing it will damage our security. You can’t just go declassifying stuff right and left just because the Democrats want to see it.