July 21st, 2008 by
Red
Supposedly McCain said the right thing one day with
I think that we’ve proven that both parents are important in the success of a family so, no, I don’t believe in gay adoption.
But then under pressure from the homosexual agenda he was forced, probably under gunpoint, and you can only imagine what it would take to get a POW like McCain to give in, so who can argue that the homosexual agenda isn’t violent and going to take over the world? He changed his position according to his PR person
McCain’s expressed his personal preference for children to be raised by a mother and a father wherever possible. However, as an adoptive father himself, McCain believes children deserve loving and caring home environments, and he recognizes that there are many abandoned children who have yet to find homes. McCain believes that in those situations that caring parental figures are better for the child than the alternative.
Come on! There’s not nearly enough outrage over this! Stop abandoning your supporters, McCain, and get back on track with things! We can defend you from the homosexual agenda if you only let us!
Posted in John McCain, homosexuals |
No Comments »
December 8th, 2007 by
Red
I’m not seeing much reporting on this, you’d think the liberal media would be jumping all over this as some kind of bad thing to make Huckabee sound like a retard:
Mike Huckabee once advocated isolating AIDS patients from the general public, opposed increased federal funding in the search for a cure and said homosexuality could “pose a dangerous public health risk.” As a candidate for a U.S. Senate seat in 1992, Huckabee answered 229 questions submitted to him by The Associated Press. Besides a quarantine, Huckabee suggested that Hollywood celebrities fund AIDS research from their own pockets, rather than federal health agencies.
Lucky for us this is getting out now. Everyone needs to start pushing their support over to Huckabee. We can see from this that he isn’t one of those liberal Republicans who is soft on gays and thinks AIDS is normal. Huckabee is clearly very hard on gays and that’s the way it should be.
We see that he predicted way back in 1992 that homosexuals would be a dangerous public health risk, and that’s turned out to be true since we can see that AIDS is everywhere now. If Huckabee was president back in 1992 instead of Slick Bill Clinton, maybe AIDS would be under control and we wouldn’t be attacked with gay stuff all over television and movies.
Come on, fellow conservatives! Mike Huckabee needs us now more than ever, we need to get behind him and show the world that America isn’t all gay people with AIDS, there are straight people here who understand what’s going on.
Posted in homosexuals |
No Comments »
February 26th, 2007 by
Red
I do like a good movie once in a while. Every now and then I can let myself be absorbed into the movie and temporarily forget about the Communist liberals that made it. But then I try to watch something like the Oscars awards last night, and I get it shoved in my face. Over and over and over.
Come on, Hollywood, get over it. The real America doesn’t want to hear about your made up global warming nonsense, and doesn’t want to see these gay people trying to push their homosexual agenda on us non-stop during the show.
How many gay people were there last night, really? You had Ellen Degeneres hosting it, throwing in homosexual comments throughout the night. Melissa Ethridge won for best song, which is weird enough itself when everyone who wasn’t gay was expecting Dreamgirls to win something so doesn’t that sound like a homosexual conspiracy or something? But then she has to go and keep mentioning her “wife” … how about not shoving your gay marriage agenda down our throats with your made up marriages while we’re trying to watch the Oscars?
You know they were wondering how they didn’t manage to make another movie like Brokeback Mountain this year so they had some other way to push homosexuality on us.
And then giving Al Gore an award for An Inconvenient Truth, where everyone was falling over themselves to make it sound as if global warming wasn’t some big fiction. Just the way that the movie was even eligible for a documentary award when it was a big work of fiction is a sign that Hollywood is crazy.
I don’t think I’d ever watch another Academy Awards after the mess of liberal claptrap that I had to sit through last night. I hope you’ll all join me in that and really send a message to those moonbats that they can’t keep being as ultra left wing as they were last night without alienating the normal people like us in the audience, right?
Posted in global warming, homosexuals |
No Comments »
October 12th, 2006 by
Red
Well, so I don’t want to make it sound like I’m all happy that North Korea tested a nuclear bomb, because that’s not a good thing for the world. But it is a good thing for America, because it gives Republicans a little bit of the boost they need to get back into voter’s favor after the Mark Foley thing.
Yeah, it’s hard to believe that voters would have it in for Republicans after hearing about Mark Foley. Didn’t they see that Foley was gay? Shouldn’t that be discrediting the liberal “gays are good and won’t molest your kids” slant that the liberal media puts on everything?
But no, with the media’s take on the Foley story, it just looks bad for the Republicans, and not for the liberals who think that Foley should be allowed to marry the Congressional pages that he was interested in.
But now with North Korea’s nuclear test, we finally have some good news. Everyone knows that Democrats aren’t the party you want controlling things when there are military issues at stake, and so the growing threat that is North Korea is only a good thing for the Republican party.
Now let me say this again, North Korea is still a bad country. It just happens that the bad things that they’re doing are helping America, by helping Americans realize that they need to vote for Republicans, and not some pedophilia loving, soft on war Democrats.
Will it be enough to make a difference in the Novermber elections? I guess we’ll just have to wait and see. But it’s certainly a good sign.
Posted in North Korea, homosexuals |
1 Comment »
October 2nd, 2006 by
Red
Yeah, the liberal media is getting all excited about Mark Foley, and especially that other Republicans and the FBI knew about it earlier than the public.
But I’m not sure what he did wrong. If you look up the age of consent in Washington, DC, it turns out to be 16 years old, which is how old the page was that sparked this whole thing. So it would have been perfectly legal for him to get involved with a 16 year old. I don’t understand why the law is like that, but it is, and so why take it out on Foley when the law is on his side?
Even worse in my opinion is his homosexuality. Why do we let the Congressional pages be exposed to gay people in government? Would any parent send their child to be a page if they knew that that was a possibility? And now look what happened in that case. I’m not saying that we should not let gay people into Congress, but it looks like there needs to be more strict supervision so that this type of thing doesn’t happen any more, whatever it is that happened here that shouldn’t have. Like I said earlier I’m still not completely clear on what he did wrong.
Posted in homosexuals |
1 Comment »
September 4th, 2006 by
Red
Frank Rich has a new column out called “Donald Rumsfeld’s Dance With the Nazis.” I apologize in advance if I get too outraged over this, but just look at that title!
First of all, Rich is saying that Rumsfeld is very friendly with Nazis. I don’t see how this can possibly be true. Rumsfeld was even pointing out how all the liberals that were trying to stop the spread of freedom in the world were like the people who ignored the spread of Nazis before World War II. Doesn’t that mean that Rumsfeld doesn’t like Nazis at all?
But then he goes and uses the word dance, which is just more of the Hollywood liberal gay brainwashing campaign. He doesn’t talk about it any more, but the title is definitely saying that Donald Rumsfeld has a homosexual love for Nazi men. That’s disgusting, but no less then you would expect from these types.
In a decent society the New York Times would put out an apology saying that Donald Rumsfeld is not a gay Nazi at all, but I’m not expecting to see that any time soon. I’m sure they won’t fire Frank Rich over this either. It’s really a hothouse of fascism over there, and they seem to really and truly hate America. Disgusting.
Posted in New York Times, homosexuals |
1 Comment »