That’s right, you read it here first. Scott Brown will defeat Martha Coakley for the Senate position in Massachusettes.

CNN doesn’t get it right:

If GOP state Sen. Scott Brown upsets Democratic Attorney General Martha Coakley, Republicans would strip Democrats of their 60-seat filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. Republicans would have enough votes to block future Senate votes on a broad range of White House priorities.

Election turnout is expected to be “pretty good,” said Brian McNiff, a spokesman for the office of Massachusetts Secretary of State Bill Galvin.

But I was actually watching the news this morning, and saw all of the snow coming down there. I bet those fat cat liberals in Washington didn’t take that into account. No liberal with their sissy Japanese hybrid cars are going to be able to make it to the polls with all of that snow, so only real American cars like SUVs and trucks will be able to get there, and we know that it’s not Democrats driving those cars.

Easy victory for Scott Brown, and the final nail in the coffin of the Obama health care Communist disaster that he’s trying to inflict!

If there was ever any doubt whose side God was on, this answers it. God brings the snow on this day of all days to say “No Communist health care for America!” and also to say “No such thing as global worming!”

How can anyone keep claiming global warming is real in the face of all of this election day snow? Hopefully this will shut them up for good.

Its only been two days since Obama stole the election from John McCain and Sarah Palin, and already the already liberal media is falling over themselves to move even farther left then they already were.

Take this Fox News video as an example. Fox News has always been much more fair and balanced and in the center then most of the other mainstream media, but now that everyone claims that Barack Obama won the election, they’ve started attacking Republicans and trying to make everyone think that they’re ultra-socialists also.

In that video you see Fox News saying that Sarah Palin is stupid for not knowing if Africa was a country or a continent, or that South Africa was a country, or what countries made up North America. They also try to claim that Palin threw tantrums and threw things in the mornings when she saw what she had to do for the day.

Now come on. This is all just shameless. With Fox News attacking Palin after the election, we’re running out of safe media outlets that will just report the news fairly without such a far left Communist bias like Fox News is starting to do.

Can’t we get a single fair TV station for news? This country is turning into Russia even faster then anyone would have expected, after so many stupid sheeple went and voted for a terrorist for president.

I can’t believe that I haven’t seen other people talking about this yet, but maybe nobody else has figured it out. Barack Hussein Obama, or as I like to call him, NObama, is trying to make America permanently liberal and Democrat. If you all elect him tomorrow, there will be no turning back, a Republican can’t win again.

Why is this? Ill tell you. If you look at the breakdowns of who supports Obama and who supports John McCain and Sarah Palin, most of the time poor black people and educated white people support Obama (doesn’t that show you that there’s something that doesn’t make sense about his campaign in the first place??) and less educated white people support McCain/Palin, Country First.

Ok, so that’s all weird, but whatever. The polls keep showing that it’s true, and I’m talking real polls that aren’t spun by the liberal mainstream media even.

But then you hear Obama always going on and on about trying to get more kids to go to college by making it more affordable (I’m guessing by spending more of my tax dollars to send these kids to colleges, like socialism.) Doesn’t anybody see the connection???

If enough people vote Osama (oops, Obama) into the White House (no pun intended) then he’ll send more kids to college. More kids going to college means more well educated white people, which means more support for Democrats. That means those kids are going to just keep voting for Democrats, who will just keep educating the kids better, which means more and more Democrats in office. It’s a horrible cycle.

The only way I can see to stop it is to vote for McCain and Palin tomorrow. NObama winning would be the end of Ameria as we know it, it would have nothing but communist liberals running it from tomorrow until the end of the world.

Seriously, why isn’t anybody talking about this??? We need to vote McCain tomorrow or we’re all doomed.

Well, Hillary Clinton today gave an “I’m In” announcement and short little pointless video saying that yes she is running for the 2008 Presidential election.

Am I the only one who remembers her going on TV show after TV show and facing lots of questions about whether or not she would run, and emphatically saying that she would not run for president? She kept answering the questions like the reporters or talk show hosts were idiots for even asking them. “No, I’m not going to run for president, why do you keep asking me that?” It’s not an exact quote, but that’s basically what she was saying.

And now here we are, a year or so later, and Hillary Clinton is starting her campaign off by revealing that those were outright lies, and that she really is running for President.

Can anyone take her seriously after that? Why start off with huge lies? Bill Clinton was impeached for lying, why hasn’t she learned anything from that? Are there even any Democrats out there who would consider voting for such an extreme liberal like Hillary Clinton, especially after all these lies from even before she started her campaign?

It’s sickening that nobody is pointing this out, and that her campaign is going to get all this positive media attention from the liberal media. Can’t we get some balance in there, someone pointing these things out? I can’t do it all, people.

I’m sorry if I haven’t written anything here for a while. Other things got in the way, and then the midterm elections a few weeks ago…well I’d rather not think about them. What a depressing thing they were.

But even the liberal media has their own weird spin on what the elections meant. It was pretty clear that the liberals had brainwashed America into following them into their hellish vision of America where the terrorists win and the rest of the world crumbles under dictatorships and all that. But the liberal media is spinning it differently:

It used to be an accepted fact of political life: Elections are won in the center.

Democrats had to move right and Republicans to the left after clinching their party nominations because most Americans are wary of ideologues.

That CW got scrambled by Karl Rove’s hard-edged, play-to-the-base, govern-with-51 percent strategy, echoed by House Republicans who basically cut the Dems out of any meaningful role rather than seeking to peel off like-minded members to build coalitions.

Now, though, could the middle be making a comeback? The Democrats won in large measure by capturing swing voters turned off by the war and the GOP. Rahm Emanuel, rather than applying litmus tests, recruited lots of moderate-to-conservative Democrats who won in red territory. These new members oppose abortion and gun control and are not likely to be big spenders or taxers.

Ok so they’re trying to make it sound like the Democrats only won by appealing to the middle, which is weird. Why would the liberal media say something like that that makes it sound like America isn’t as liberal after all, no matter what the election results show? You know they have to be up to no good with a weird strategy like that, but I cant figure out what it is.

If anyone of you can figure it out, let me know in the comments. Its troubling and something we should be watching out for but I don’t know what it all means.