Well, so I don’t want to make it sound like I’m all happy that North Korea tested a nuclear bomb, because that’s not a good thing for the world. But it is a good thing for America, because it gives Republicans a little bit of the boost they need to get back into voter’s favor after the Mark Foley thing.

Yeah, it’s hard to believe that voters would have it in for Republicans after hearing about Mark Foley. Didn’t they see that Foley was gay? Shouldn’t that be discrediting the liberal “gays are good and won’t molest your kids” slant that the liberal media puts on everything?

But no, with the media’s take on the Foley story, it just looks bad for the Republicans, and not for the liberals who think that Foley should be allowed to marry the Congressional pages that he was interested in.

But now with North Korea’s nuclear test, we finally have some good news. Everyone knows that Democrats aren’t the party you want controlling things when there are military issues at stake, and so the growing threat that is North Korea is only a good thing for the Republican party.

Now let me say this again, North Korea is still a bad country. It just happens that the bad things that they’re doing are helping America, by helping Americans realize that they need to vote for Republicans, and not some pedophilia loving, soft on war Democrats.

Will it be enough to make a difference in the Novermber elections? I guess we’ll just have to wait and see. But it’s certainly a good sign.

Yeah, the liberal media is getting all excited about Mark Foley, and especially that other Republicans and the FBI knew about it earlier than the public.

But I’m not sure what he did wrong. If you look up the age of consent in Washington, DC, it turns out to be 16 years old, which is how old the page was that sparked this whole thing. So it would have been perfectly legal for him to get involved with a 16 year old. I don’t understand why the law is like that, but it is, and so why take it out on Foley when the law is on his side?

Even worse in my opinion is his homosexuality. Why do we let the Congressional pages be exposed to gay people in government? Would any parent send their child to be a page if they knew that that was a possibility? And now look what happened in that case. I’m not saying that we should not let gay people into Congress, but it looks like there needs to be more strict supervision so that this type of thing doesn’t happen any more, whatever it is that happened here that shouldn’t have. Like I said earlier I’m still not completely clear on what he did wrong.